![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirxeSNaKtXXjEl3uE_jgfs99h4REdFJ-aW81xVqcYLK28tjShXiHJgoAVTmWWyRXhlo5ONi0PhFEcBVzALuEQaTMCfpmPaGFyzmxN6coSgFVR_dUZ8ZXP0ii2oZPjQrf1RnaQDOlnh4XI/s320/Ethanol.JPG)
Debate over biofuels has always been more about politics and economics than technology. Consider for example, d
rought conditions in 2012 that brought attention to ethanol as a component of transportation fuel. In this case, there was a
call for Congress to suspend biofuel production 'goals' that were originally mandated to reduce US greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. So, suspend our GHG emission goals in favor of lower food costs?
It gets very complicated very quickly, so rather than get mired in macro-economics that are beyond Triple E's understanding, let's examine the scientific and quasi-political components of the debate.
Triple E Agent Assignment:
Present the pros and cons for using ethanol as a fuel additive or as a primary fuel...
What do you put first, personal economic gain/savings, environmental benefits, or the state of the union?